As Uniswap Dao again voted online to deploy to the BNB franchise, LiFiCEO Philip Zenweiler made up lies in a forum post on February 6th, and the proposal at this stage is also biased. According to Zentner, the scheme of using jumpers as the only bridge for Uniswap should be abandoned. In turn, he claims that Uniswap researchers should focus on using several roads and bridges to deal with standardized system software for regulation management decisions.

Zentner pointed out in the post that LiFi strongly urged that "Uniswap does not have to deploy to its BNB chain and it is better to choose a bridge service provider" because "there is no robust and security solution that can be relied on alone through adequate testing of a single AMB [random messaging bridge] called Uniswap mass."

As evidence of this, Zentner reminds readers of many bridge hackers who have logged in to password communities in the past few years, he said:

"Don't forget that in the past 12 months, the two most important AMB have been used (Nomad and Wormhole), and LayerZero has recently been criticized for its security model (Prestwich 2 Magi L2Beat). This is not a reprimand, in turn, it is emphasized to focus on how difficult it is to create a secure AMBS and the subsequent risks of choosing a single bridge mode solution, DAPP.

For these reasons, LiFi wants to see a "multi-bridge, unknowable approach" to Uniswap governance. Zentner made it clear that this could be achieved by serving on a team of four technical engineers to explore the subject and submit proposals at the same time.

LiFiCEO seems to suggest that the proposal at this stage needs to be rejected and that the deployment date of the BNB chain should be extended to at least March 27th. According to a picture released by Zentner, the Uniswap elite team previously set a March 27 deadline for the release of a final report with community recommendations. 'i firmly believe that even if the proposal at this stage is rejected by an online vote, this deadline can still be met, 'Mr. Zent said.

Venture capital firm A16Z recently tried to use its 15 million UNI dynamic passwords to veto BNB's proposal, mainly because the company was uneasy about the safety of jumping wormbridge. But Consensys, a MetamAsk real estate developer, used its 7 million Uni votes to promote the proposal. Online voting is scheduled for February 10th.