A community member believes that the space will look back to this moment once it succeeds in making the world decentralized.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has now adopted another anti-encryption measure to resist encryption becoming legal tender. Members of the encrypted community quickly fought back and expressed different views on Twitter.
The IMF Executive Board recently approved an existing policy framework for encrypted property that does not grant official online currency or legal tender influence to encrypted property. Management allows this structure and points out that it is also a necessary measure to maintain the relative stability of the loan currency.
From expressing their strong support for BTC to comparing such things with other technological advances, many community members have hit back at IMF's vain attempt to stigmatize encryption as a legal tender.
One Twitter customer stated that IMF would never accept BTC simply because they didn't want all market competition. On the other hand, another community member felt that wanting to withdraw debt slaves from the central bank government soon realized that Bitcoin was the only way to do so.
One community member tried to laugh at the situation, generalizing IMF's efforts to resist encryption and complaining about e-mail printers. They wrote on Twitter:
In addition, Twitter user and Bitcoin client Metty Bmenger expressed his delight that countries around the world are different from the International Monetary Fund and can "do their best to their Chinese citizens." Another member of the login password community feels that once the blockchain technology around the world is well implemented, this is another historical node that the community can look back on.
The International Monetary Fund has repeatedly resisted the use of login passwords as legal tender. On Feb. 15, members of the login password community also expressed their views on IMF putting pressure on El Salvador to carefully consider his bitcoin plans. Some people shrugged off the news, calling it "FUD", while others saw it as a positive upward data signal for BTC.