Artists have taken great pains to resist AI painting. Gonghuo is the strongest legal department in the world. Artists draw new actions to resist AI. The following content will answer for you.

1、 Artists resist AI's latest moves

In order to resist AI painting, artists can be said to take great pains. Recently, someone has come up with the latest move to defeat magic with magic: all the images of famous characters such as Disney and Nintendo are "summoned" to challenge the "rules of the game" of AI. Gonghuo is the strongest legal department, and artists resist AI to draw new tricks. They did draw by drawing. AI is generated, but it seems to give people the feeling of "creation, but not complete creation". After all, in terms of image, it is just like the original Mickey Mouse.

There are also many characters suffering from this wave of "fighting poison with poison", including Mario, Spiderman, Batman, Pikachu and Wukong. Not even Musk.

"Escaped a disaster", Gonghuo is the strongest legal department, and the artist resists AI, the artist, to paint in a new way. When AI is painting, don't forget to attach a wave of "mouth hiding" mockery on the social platform: AI is a bit difficult to draw dragon beads, but I believe that AI can draw as well as the author himself if I give it more data.

Think it's over? No，No，No。 He also expressed the voice of netizens - many people want to buy these AI around paintings. Then I attached a mockery: I believe in Nintendo, Marvel Comics and Marvel Comics. DC doesn't mind. After all, AI doesn't copy. These works are 100% original.

The artist who works in this way is Eric Bourdages, the main beauty of Dawn Kill. The company behind the AI painting he wants to boycott is Midjournal, which exploded this year. But when Eric "played" happily, I also noticed it in Midjournal.

Then Midjournal's next operation can be said to push the public opinion to the climax. Eric returns the "subscription fee" he paid previously and does not allow him to continue using Midjournal. Well, this wave of artists and AI is really enough for drama.

2、 Why did Eric, the artist, do this?

In fact, this is not the first time that artists have resisted AI painting. It has happened before that only 32 pieces of graphics were used for painting, which has also caused a lot of heated discussion. And this time, this time. Eric resists the action of Midjournal Company to customize the copyright rules for AI.

If the user is a company employee with an annual income of more than $1 million, the company must subscribe to an "enterprise plan" to use Midjournal. Eric also expressed his views on this. In his view, the data on the Internet is now easy to obtain, and many access methods have exploited legal loopholes. Eric released these posts to resist AI stealing human art creation.

He believes that AI like Midjournal should be a tool that everyone can use, and he is also very sure of AI's impact on art development. However, at this stage, this area is in a state of lack of supervision. Eric is afraid that it will be used by people with ulterior motives for illegal activities.

3、 What is the difference between work copyright and AI?

Some people think that Eric is "specially cared for" by Midjournal probably because he is too angry; others think that he is too angry: Eric, this is not the best way to explain the copyright of AI works: what is the difference between the two? They have no copyright. Because artists spend a lot of energy to create works, they are used to create AI as training data, and the generated paintings are more like copying or splicing.

If we can't face it squarely, we should take AI seriously. With the development of mankind, the future of mankind is likely to be full of falsehood and lies, false pictures, false videos, false voices, etc. For artists, Eric believes that if AI develops to completely imitate an artist, it will erase the idea and emotion of human art creation We need to find the right way for AI to serve human beings.

Finally, Eric's onlookers' netizens gave a warm reminder: I do not plan to use these AI for profit, and I do not recommend you to do so, otherwise you may face prosecution or prohibition. There are also different sounds. For different voices, Eric has also given different views on this wave of people who eat melons to fight against poison.

summary

To sum up, the use of Midjournal copyright automatically grants the generated image Midjournal and "successor"; In other words, Midjournal has the right to use all images generated by the platform. For paying users, the images generated by AI will be considered as user assets and can be used for commercial purposes.