Consensys issued a statement on February 7th, applying the appeal in the Jarrett v.United States case, which involved the payment of tax on chip incentives. The case stems from a dispute between Joshua and Jessica Jarrett over the return of about $4000 on Tezos (XTZ) tokens tested in 2019.

The Jarrett couple claimed that his chip reward should be called an asset and would be taxed only at the time of sale. The Jarretts sued after the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) ignored his refund conditions.

These people issued a refund in 2022, but the Jarrett rebuffed, preferring to repeat his lawsuit. "I need a better answer," Joshua Jarrett said at the time.

But his suit was dismissed after a Tennessee regional court ruled in October that the refund payment made the case increasingly worthless. Now, the Jarrett couple will appeal the decision explicitly.

Bill Hughes, a high-end Consensys lawyer consultant and head of global regulatory management, said in a statement:

"We apply Josh and Jessica Jarrett's appeal, as long as we feel that American operators who operate many verifiers on Ethernet Square should be treated fairly and fairly under the Corporate income tax Act." [.] We are glad that it is not easy for the Jarrett couple to allow the IRS Court of Appeal to repair his case in accordance with the regulations to circumvent this situation.

Consensys's statement then stressed that the etheric Square Shanghai upgrade scheduled for March will allow verifiers to obtain 16 million ETH, which makes the tax and salary treatment of login passwords an immediate issue. Private enterprise blockchain technology strictly implements its views on the issue of taxes in the announcement:

"similar to crop farmers, the agreement creates a reward to encourage participation in providing security for the agreement. The assets created are not easily taxed before they are sold.

The Equity proof Alliance has also been a staunch supporter of the Jarrett family. In a statement issued after the court ruling in October, the group said: "although it is clear that the IRS has allowed Josh to receive export tax rebates for 2019, the IRS refuses to confirm this and refuses to assure Josh that he will receive the same tax salary in the future."